Click here to load whole tree
NITAAI-Veda.nyf > All Scriptures By Acharyas > Bhaktivinoda Thakura > Dashamula Tattva > Chapter-II

Chapter 2

amnaya vakya is the final proof

 

What is the meaning of amnaya vakya (authoritative statement or knowledge)?  Concerning this, there is the following karika (verse):

 

amnayah shrutayah saksad brahma-vidyeti vishrutah

guru-parampara praptah vishva kartuh hi brahmanah

 

Amnaya refers to the scriptures called brahma vidya or knowledge of brahman originating from Brahma, the creator of the universe and passed down by disciplic succession.

 

That the knowledge was passed down from Brahma is stated in Mundaka Upanishad.

 

brahma devanam prathamah sambabhuva vishvasya

karta bhuvanasya gopta sa brahma-vidyam sarva-vidya-

pratishtham atharvaya  jyeshtha-putraya praha yenaksharam

purusham veda satyam provaca tam tattvato brahma-vidyam

 

Brahma, the creator of the universe and protector of the worlds, the first among the devatas,  taught brahma vidya, the basis of all knowledge, to his eldest son Atharva. He taught that knowledge by which the indestructible Supreme Person can be known in his true form

Mundaka Upanishad 1.1.1, 1.2.13

 

Brihadaranyaka Upanishad says:

 

asya mahato bhutasya nihshvasitam etad rigvedo

yajur vedah sama vedatharvangirasa itihasah

puranam vidya upanishadah shlokah sutrany

anuvyakhyanani sarvani nihshvasitani

 

From the Supreme Person's breath came the four Vedas,  the histories, the Puranas, the Upanishads, the verses and Sutras and all the anuvyakhyas (commentaries). The word "histories" refers to Ramayana and Mahabharat and other similar works.  The word "puranas" refers to the eighteen major Puranas of which Shrimad Bhagavatam is supreme, and eighteen secondary puranas (upapuranas). Upanishads refers to the eleven Upanishads such as Isha, Kena, Katha, and Prashna.  "Verses" refers to the collection of verses in meters such as anustup composed by risis.   "Sutra" refers to the concise statements which explain the meaning of the Vedas, written by major teachers.   Anuvyakhya refers to commentaries on the sutras written by great teachers.  All of these are called amnaya. The primary meaning of amnaya is Veda.1

 

Chaitanya Caritamrita also accepts the authority of the Vedas. 

 

svatah pramana veda- pramana-siromani

lakshana haite  svatah pramanata hani

 

The self-evident Vedic literatures are the highest evidence of all, but if these literatures are interpreted, their self-evident nature is lost.

C.C. Adi 7, 139

 

pramanera madhye shruti pramana pradhana

shruti ye mukhyartha kahe sei se pramana

svatah pramana veda  yei satya kahe

lakshana karile svatah pramanya hani haye

 

Although there is other evidence, the evidence given in the Vedic version must be taken as foremost.  Vedic versions understood directly are first-class evidence.

The Vedic statements are self-evident.  Whatever is stated there must be accepted.  If we interpret according to our own imagination, the authority of the Vedas is immediately lost.

                             C.C.Madhya 6, 135, 137

 

 The works of the Gosvamis such as the Sandarbhas and Chaitanya Caritamrita of Krishna das Kaviraja are included among the anuvyakhyas.    Therefore Vedas, Puranas, histories, Upanishads, Vedanta Sutras, the commentaries by the Vaishnava acaryas are all  considered  authoritative knowledge.  These sources of authoritative knowledge are glorified in the Bhagavatam.

 

kalena nashta pralaye vaniyam veda samjnita

mayadau brahmane prokta yasyam dharmo mad

atmakah tena prokta svaputraya manave

yabhir bhutani bhidyante bhutanam patayas tatha

evam prakriti-vaicitryad bidyante matayo nrinam

parasparyena keshamcit pashanda-matayo'pare

 

( Shri Krishna speaks to Uddhava)

I first recited the Vedic message to Lord Brahma, telling him about the ultimate path of pure devotion.  That message is eternal.  At the time of devastation,  it disappears and at the time of creation I explain it  clearly to Lord Brahma.    Brahma spoke this knowledge to his son Manu and others.  Thereafter, the devatas, risis, and mankind all received this knowledge.    The living entities and their lords are all different, receiving natures according to the three modes,  goodness, passion and ignorance.  According to these different natures, various philosophies have been produced by various interpretation of the meaning.  O Uddhava, those who received the actual statements of the Vedas through guru parampara anuvyakhya  (explanations) from Brahma have the real truth.   All others philosophies have become the servants of various offensive teachings.

                                                                                S.B.11.14.3,7,82

 

Here it is clearly understood that the Brahma sampradaya has existed from  the time of creation.  In this Brahma sampradaya, the pure message of the Vedas has come down through the guru parampara and  has preserved the real teachings of bhagavat dharma.  Thus these teachings are called amnaya  (a  + mna (to remember)+ ya:   that which is learned by passing down)   Those who do not accept the brahma sampradaya which is shown to be authoritative by such statements as  "Brahma, the lord of the universe, is the first student of Narayana, Lord of  Vaikuntha"3  are called  preachers of  irrelevant philosophy (pasanda mata) by Krishna.   Though a person accepts the teachings of Lord Chaitanya, if  he cannot accept this parampara line, is he not most deceptive?   The fortunate people consider this knowledge handed down in parampara as the best of proofs.  This is Lord Chaitanya's first teaching. 4

 

In the Tattva Sandarbha (9.10),  Jiva Gosvami says:

 

athaivam shucitanam shri-krishna-vacya-vacakata-lakshana-

sambandha-tad-bhajana-lakshana-vidheya-  tat-prema-lakshana-

prayojanakhyanam arthanam nirnayaya pramanam tavad

 vinirniyate tatra purushasya bhramadi-dosha-catushtayatvat

sutaram acintyalaukika-vastu-sparshayogyatvac ca tat-

pratyakshadinyapi sadoshani tatas tani na pramananity

 anadi-siddha-sarva- purusha-paramparasu sarvalaukikalaukika-

jnana-nidanatvad aprakrita-vacana-lakshano veda evasmakam

 sarvatita- sarvashraya- sarvacintyashcarya-svabhavam vastu

 vividishatam pramanam

 

I have just mentioned sambandha, abhidheya and prayojana.  In order to explain the meaning of these terms, I first will define the nature of authoritative proof.  Mankind is by nature afflicted with the four defects  (bhrama  etc.)  and therefore cannot understand inconceivable I,  non-material matters.  Direct sense perception will always be faulty, and therefore sense perception, inference and other normal means of knowledge cannot be considered as authoritative means of knowledge. The only means of knowledge (pramana) for persons desiring knowledge of the ultimate  supreme object, the ultimate shelter, the inconceivable,  endowed with the most remarkable nature, is the Veda.  The Veda is perfect knowledge concerning both material and spiritual topics, handed down through a parampara of realized persons. 

 

Having established the authority of the Vedic knowledge, Jiva Gosvami then shows how the Puranas contain the same  message as the Vedas, and establishes the Shrimad Bhagavatam as the best of all pramanas.  The same qualities which make Shrimad Bhagavatam the best of all knowledge are present in the words of  Brahma, Narada,Vyasa, Shukadeva, and in the writings of Madhvacarya  and his followers Vijayadvaja, Brahmatirtha and Vyasatirtha. 

 

By all these statements, it is evident that the Brahma sampradaya is the sampradaya of Lord Chaitanya and his followers.   Ascertaining this, Kavikarnapura has written the sequence of the parampara in his work Gaura Ganodesha Dipika.  The Vedanta Sutra commentator Baladeva Vidyabhushana also confirms this parampara line.    Anyone who does not accept this parampara is without doubt the greatest enemy of the followers of  Chaitanya Mahaprabhu.

Concerning authoritative knowledge of the Vedas, the following should be especially noted.   The Vedic statements are perfect and self-evident.  There is no need for interpreting an indirect meaning.  The meaning is understood by hearing the words with their  direct meaning.  "The son of Shaci is directly the son of  Nanda."   On hearing these words a person can understand that Lord Chaitanya is none other than Krishna.  The phrase  "cowherd on the Ganga" however makes no sense by taking the direct meaning of the words.  By indirect interpretation one can understand that the phrase means " A cowherd village on the bank of the Ganga."  In Vedic statements one should not resort to interpretation unless necessary.   

 

In the Chandogya Upanishad it is said, "I surrender to the energy through Shyama.  I surrender to Shyama through His energy."   When a sensible meaning can be derived from taking the direct meaning of the words, why should we  infer that the words "shyama" means "the impersonal Brahman in the heart, " as Sankaracarya does? Liberated persons worship the forms of Radha and Krishna.  This is the real meaning of the statement.  Because of this, in the Chaitanya Caritamrita it is stated that by resorting to indirect meanings the value of the Vedas as authority is lost.

 

There are many varieties of interpretations.  Jagadisha mentions in Shabda Shakti Prakashika that there are countless types  of  interpretation, such as jahatsvartha, ajahatsvartha, nirudha and adhunika.

 

jahat svarthajahat svartha nirudhadhunikadikah

lakshana vividhas tabhir lakshakam syad anekadha

 

However, none of these interpretive means can be used to define the nature of  something spiritual.  Rather, in doing so, they give rise to misinterpretation.  Sankaracarya argues that direct meaning of words cannot be used in relation to indescribable phenomena; therefore, the indirect interpretation must be used for find the meaning of Vedic statements.   Madhvacarya has objected to this as follows:

 

nangikritabhidha yasya lakshana tasya no bhavet

nasti gramah kutah sima na putro janakam vina

                            

In examining the power of words, it is seen that where direct meaning is not accepted, interpretation also has no place.  Where there exists no village, can one ague about its extent or size?  Where there is no father, can one speak of his son?

Tattvamuktavali 22

 

If the direct meaning is rejected in relation to spiritual matters, then what use is interpretation of the same words, which must depend ultimately upon the direct meaning?    Therefore the intelligent man will reject interpretation and accept the direct connotative power of the words of the scriptures in trying to understand the absolute truth.

 

The following karika summarizes the point:

 

ya adikavaye tene hrida brahma-sanatanam

sa chaitanyah kalau saksad amarjit tam matam shubham

vipralipsa pramadash ca karanapatavam bhramah

manushanam vicareshu syad dhi dosha catushtayam

tad-adhokshaja-tattveshu durnivaryam budhair api

apaurusheya-vakhyani pramanam tatra kevalam

pratyaksham anumanam ca tad adhinataya kvacit

 

Lord Chaitanya, who bestowed the Vedic knowledge unto the heart of Brahma, has appeared in Kali Yuga in Navadvipa.   .  He has revealed the pure essence of the Vedas, freeing the pure Vedic philosophy from the contamination of Kali Yuga.    The human being in concluding anything must certainly indulge in the four faults of error, omission, limitation and cheating.     In relation to spiritual matters, even the greatest learned men cannot avoid these four defects.    Therefore, in spiritual matters, the only authority is the word of Veda, which has no human author. All other proofs, such as sense perception, inference, simile and tradition, when they are in agreement with the Vedic word, can be useful and relevant.

 

 1 After showing that the spiritual knowledge comes from Brahma in succession, Bhaktivinoda shows that not only the Vedas, but Puranas and